Archive | December, 2008

San Mateo Homeowners: You Should Know

Posted on 30 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

<br />

Credit for Energy – Efficient Improvements to a Personal Residence by a Homeowner - sound like tax language? It is. Anyway, the credit is back. It was available for 2006 and 2007 but not 2009. Well, it’s back for 2009.

So if you were thinking about putting in double-pane windows or buying new appliances, maybe this will be the impetus.

One of the 2008 Tax Acts – credit for solar, wind and other alternative energy expenditures by homeowners – does extend through 2016.

Popularity: 48% [?]

Comments (3)

Suze’s Save Yourself Plan

Posted on 29 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

<br />

Suze Orman wants you to save.  And she’s making an offer you can’t refuse.

Open a new (non-retirement) Save Yourself account at TD AMERITRADE and make 12 consecutive monthly deposits of $100 or more, and TD AMERITRADE will give you $100*!

Popularity: 39% [?]

Comments (1)

San Mateo Money Saver – Goldstar

Posted on 15 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

<br />


Want to have a fun night out without spending a ton of money?  Get on Goldstar’s alert email list to receive discounts on everything from facials to the ballet, musicals to comedy shows.  Discounts run from free to half price.  It’s a great service and it’s free.

Want to keep track of money-saving suggestions?  Subscribe to my blog feed.

Popularity: 47% [?]

Comments (0)

Vicki Moore, Realtor DRE No 01234539 Graduate, Realtor Institute Alain Pinel Realtors San Mateo County CA san mateo real estate blog / facebook / twitter T. 650.888.9268 / E. Vicki[@]CallVicki.com

San Mateo Real Estate Week In Review 12/6 to 12/12/08

Posted on 15 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

 

<br />

 


This week had a better showing for a lot of cities as compared to last week.  Cities like Brisbane, Burlingame, Hillsborough, and San Mateo sold more houses than were listed.  Daly City, El Granada, Half Moon Bay, Pacifica, Redwood City and Redwood Shores all kept up with the new listings by selling just as many. 

Most homes sold for under the asking price; but Menlo Park had a surprising showing of selling 5 of its 6 listings for over the asking price.

For the third week in a row Belmont, Burlingame, Daly City, El Granada, Half Moon Bay, Hillsborough, Menlo Park, Millbrae, Montara, Moss Beach, Redwood City, San Bruno, San Carlos, and San Mateo all saw a decline in the number of homes available for sale. 


  Available Listed Into Contract At List Above List Below List
Atherton 23 0 0 0 0 1
Belmont 42 3 2 2 0 2
Brisbane 8 0 1 0 0 0
Burlingame 42 2 4     3
Daly City 159 9 9 2 0 6
El Granada 15 1 1 0 0 0
Foster City 27 4 2 0 0 3
Half Moon Bay 60 1 1 0 0 0
Hillsborough 50 1 2 0 0 1
Menlo Park 98 5 4 0 5 1
Millbrae 35 2 1 0 0 2
Montara 21 0 0 0 0 0
Moss Beach 13 0 0 0 0 0
Pacifica 75 5 5 0 0 1
Portola Valley 26 0 1 0 0 1
Redwood City 167 9 9 1 1 5
Redwood Shores 12 1 1 0 0 0
San Bruno 60 6 5 1 0 0
San Carlos 62 6 2 0 0 4
San Mateo 133 8 11 1 1 3
South San Francisco 119 10 5 0 2 2
Woodside 40 0 0 0 0 0

 

Got a San Mateo County real estate question?   Call me at 650.888.9268 or send me an email Vicki [at] CallVicki.com.   If you like what you’ve read, subscribe to the San Mateo Real Estate Blog feed.

Start your San Mateo home search here.

Popularity: 60% [?]

Comments (2)

San Mateo Median House Prices Q3 2008

Posted on 11 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

 

<p></p>


I’ve gone on and on about median prices and what they mean.  You can catch my soapbox theory at that post.

Here’s the straight dope:  The median prices are calculated by looking at the MSA or Metropolitan Statistical AreaAs Realtor.org says, MSA’s “are as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and include the specified city or cities and surrounding suburban areas.”  What’s that mean?  It means that San Mateo County is lumped in with San Francisco, Oakland and Fremont.


California existing home sales

2005 2006 2007 2007.III 2007.IV 2008.I 2008.II r 2008.III p Qtr. Yr.
                % Change % Change
601.1 459.9 355.0 314.4 305.2 310.0 388.8 498.0 28.1% 58.4%

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont Metropolitan Statistical Area

2005 2006 2007 2007.III 2007.IV 2008.I 2008.II r 2008.III p % Change
715.7 752.8 805.4 824.2 778.0 701.7 684.9 615.7 -25.3%

San Mateo County Median Sales Price Q3 2007 & 2008

  2007 Q3  2008 Q3 % of Change
San Mateo County 1,147,720 777,777 -47
Atherton 4,300,000 3,925,000 -9
Belmont 937,250 900,000 -4
Brisbane 1,025,000 860,000 -7
Burlingame 1,359,000 1,212,000 -11
Daly City 710,000 560,000 -22
East Palo Alto 584,900 315,000 -47
El Granada 970,500 655,000 -33
Foster City 1,175,000 1,088,000 -8
Half Moon Bay 1,150,000 859,837 -26
Hillsborough 2,852,000 2,323,750 -19
La Honda 665,000 250,000 -63
Loma Mar 647,500 1,100,000 69
Menlo Park 1,207,000 1,340,000 11
Millbrae 975,000 980,000 0.5
Montara 1,145,000 847,500 -26
Moss Beach 819,000 700,000 -15
Pacifica 728,825 580,000 -21
Pescadero 645,000 2,150,000 97
Portola Valley 2,430,000 2,050,000 -16
Redwood City 872,500 790,000 -10
Redwood Shores 1,194,000 1,065,000 -11
San Bruno 755,500 599,500 -21
San Carlos 1,151,000 1,020,000 -12
San Mateo 945,400 825,000 -13
South San Francisco 700,000 580,000 -18
Woodside 2,335,000 1,600,000 -32

Got a San Mateo County real estate question?   Call me at 650.888.9268 or send me an email Vicki [at] CallVicki.com.   If you like what you’ve read, subscribe to the San Mateo Real Estate Blog feed.

Start your San Mateo home search here.

Popularity: 83% [?]

Comments (2)

San Mateo County 2008 Month-Month Home Sales

Posted on 10 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

<br />


Daly City and South San Francisco have continued to steadily decline in inventory.  Daly City from over 5 months’ inventory in January to just under 2 in November.  South City from 6 months to 2.3 months’ inventory.

The only dramatic changes have been increases in inventory.  Atherton, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Montara and Portola Valley have all double in numbers comparing January to November.

Looking at other stats in Foster City, it appears that that increase is having an impact:  The median sale price has gone from $1,227,500 in January to $999,888 in November  – a drop in median of over $225,000.  The percentage of list price dropped from 99.31% to 97.23%.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov
Atherton 8.5 4 3.6 3.1 6 2.8 5.0 14 6.8 7.25 23
Belmont 3.4 2.2 1.3 2.3 2 1.86 1.9 3.8 3.2 3.6 2.8
Brisbane 3.7 5.5 2.3 15 8.5 3.25 3.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 8
Burlingame 2.8 2 2.1 1.8 2.4 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.7 2.94 3.5
Colma 1 2 3 5 4 2 1.5 4 2.0 3 1.5
Daly City 5.3 3.8 3.2 3.5 2.2 1.6 2.0 1.96 1.9 1.8 1.7
El Granada 8.3 8.3 8.7 4.7 3.3 4.3 4.4 2.7 2.9 4.8 3.8
Foster City 2.7 2.3 1.3 2.2 1.8 2.14 3.0 1.2 3.3 3.75 7
Half Moon Bay 6.5 3.9 4.3 4.3 6.3 7.9 3.4 3.8 5.7 6.25 15.75
Hillsborough 3.1 3.3 2.9 3 5.8 4.3 4.8 4.1 3.4 7.63 7.4
La Honda 11 12 12 6 3.5 4.3 7.5 6.5 7.5 6.5 10
Loma Mar 1 1 2 3 4 4 3.0 3 2.0 2 2
Menlo Park 3.7 2.8 3.1 3 1.9 2.2 2.8 4.1 3.7 4.73 4
Millbrae 6.3 3.7 2.4 2.7 2.3 2.4 1.9 2 2.0 2.56 3.5
Montara 7.5 8.5 5.7 6.3 7 3.6 9.5 10 12.0 13 24
Moss Beach 4.5 14 3 9 4.5 5.7 2.2 2.4 18.0 4.25 7.5
Pacifica 3.3 4.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.5 2.97 3.2 2.76 3
Pescadero 9 8 8 10 8 7 9.0 10 11.0 9 8
Portola Valley 7.5 6.7 3.1 4 2.9 2.4 4.6 10.5 13.0 3.4 13.5
Redwood City 4.2 3.7 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.9 2.6 2.58 3
Redwood Shores 1.8 2 1.7 1.2 5 3 2.3 0 3.5 16 13
San Bruno 3.6 3.9 3 3.4 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5
San Carlos 2.7 2 1.8 2 1.8 1.9 1.4 1.8 2.2 3.65 3.6
San Gregorio 1 1 1 2 2 2 2.0 2 2.0 2 2
San Mateo 3.9 3.6 2.6 2.6 2.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 1.8 3.08 3
So San Francisco 6.1 7.7 4.6 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.5 1.98 2.3 2.74 2.3
Woodside 5 13.5 4.4 3.8 12.5 18.3 6.7 8.6 9.8 16.67 14

July 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates
August 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates
September 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates
October 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates
November 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates

Got a San Mateo County real estate question?   Call me at 650.888.9268 or send me an email Vicki [at] CallVicki.com.   If you like what you’ve read, subscribe to the San Mateo Real Estate Blog feed.

Popularity: 71% [?]

Comments (0)

San Mateo Real Estate Absorption Rates November 2008, 2007, 2006

Posted on 09 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

<br />


It seems that the cities with the most dramatic year-to-year changes are the ones where we’ve seen the biggest price drops, short sales and foreclosures:  Daly City, South San Francisco, East Palo Alto.  Buyers have been flocking there looking for deals – and finding them.

As agents we can often anticipate changes before the numbers actually show it.  We’ve been talking about how ironic it is that these properties have been receiving multiple offers, sometimes over the asking price – as low as they may be.  Some of these areas have seen incredible declines in inventory.  The question is:  Will that continue?

I wish I knew and so does the rest of the nation.  The only way we know when we’ve hit the bottom of the market is when we look back at the statistics; oftentimes, after the decline has started to resolve.

11/30/2006 11/30/2007 11/30/2008
Atherton 3.2 11 23
Belmont 1.3 2.4 2.8
Brisbane 1.6 4.5 8
Burlingame 1.4 3.3 3.5
Colma 0 2 1.5
Daly City 2 8 1.7
East Palo Alto 3.3 21.7 1.1
El Granada 6.3 25 3.8
Foster City 1.1 3.8 7
Half Moon Bay 2.1 6.9 15.8
Hillsborough 3.2 3.1 7.4
La Honda 5 15 10
Loma Mar 0 0 2
Menlo Park 1.4 2.4 4
Millbrae 2.6 5.4 3.3
Montara 6.3 6.3 24
Moss Beach 13 5.5 7.5
Pacifica 1.9 6.7 3
Pescadero 8 12 8
Portola Valley 3.1 8 13.5
Redwood City 2.5 4.5 3.1
Redwood Shores 1.7 2.5 13
San Bruno 2.6 5.9 1.5
San Carlos 1.8 2.2 3.6
San Gregorio 1 2 2
San Mateo 1.4 2.6 2.96
South San Francisco 3.5 6.2 2.3
Woodside 7 2.5 14

The absorption rate is a quick way to see if the number of homes for sale in San Mateo County is going up or down.  It’s just one of the statistics used to evaluate pricing.

What you’re looking at is how many months’ inventory there is on the market.  The assumption is that it will take X number of months for all of the houses currently on the market to sell.  More inventory = longer to sell.

You can also see if the area is a buyer or a sellers’ market. The National Association of Realtors defines a balanced market as one is which there is 6 months of inventory.  More than 6 months, it’s a buyers’ market; less is a sellers’ market.

July 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates
August 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates
September 2008, 2007, 2006 absorption rates

Got a San Mateo County real estate question?   Call me at 650.888.9268 or send me an email Vicki [at] CallVicki.com.   If you like what you’ve read, subscribe to the San Mateo Real Estate Blog feed.

Popularity: 64% [?]

Comments (1)

San Mateo Real Estate Week In Review 11/30/2008 – 12/5/2008

Posted on 08 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

<br />


Twice as many homes were fresh to the market this week in San Mateo County than last week.  One house sold last week compared to 31 this week.  There are 13 new homeowners this week to last week’s 4.  Looks like it’s been a busy week countywide.

San Mateo wins most new listings at 15; Daly City is a close second with 14 new ones to choose from.

While most cities declined in inventory, Atherton, Portola Valley, Redwood Shores and Woodside stayed at the same number of homes available.  Pacifica is the only city that increased in available homes – just by a few.

Available Listed Into Contract At List Above List Below List
Atherton 23 2 1 0 0 0
Belmont 47 1 2 0 0 0
Brisbane 8 0 0 0 0 0
Burlingame 47 1 4 0 0 0
Daly City 166 14 11 4 3 3
El Granada 19 0 0 0 0 1
Foster City 27 2 5 0 0 0
Half Moon Bay 62 5 2 0 0 0
Hillsborough 52 3 0 0 0 1
Menlo Park 102 3 5 0 0 0
Millbrae 38 2 0 0 0 1
Montara 23 0 0 0 0 0
Moss Beach 13 0 0 0 0 0
Pacifica 75 4 0 0 0 0
Portola Valley 27 1 1 0 0 0
Redwood City 175 12 0 0 0 0
Redwood Shores 13 3 0 0 0 0
San Bruno 60 3 0 0 0 0
San Carlos 65 11 0 0 0 0
San Mateo 142 15 0 0 0 0
South San Francisco 117 7 0 0 0 0
Woodside 42 0 0 0 0 0

Got a San Mateo County real estate question?   Call me at 650.888.9268 or send me an email Vicki [at] CallVicki.com.   If you like what you’ve read, subscribe to the San Mateo Real Estate Blog feed.

Start your San Mateo home search here.

All the best,
Vicki Moore

Popularity: 55% [?]

Comments (1)

Half Moon Bay Farmer

Posted on 07 December 2008 by Vicki Moore

This guy thought it was pretty funny that I was taking his picture but I was the one having fun.  One of the best restaurants – actually several – around are within walking distance of this field.  I’ll have to fill you in on them when it’s not 2 in the morning. :)

Popularity: 59% [?]

Comments (4)

San Mateo Buyers Should Know: Mythbuster

Posted on 03 December 2008 by Vicki Moore


Disclosure Regarding Agency RelationshipsFree Legal Forms


Don’t Get Burned

In most areas of San Mateo County it’s a buyers’ market.  Yeah.  Yeah.  You knew that.  What I bet you didn’t know is the burnt toast you’re going to end up with.  That icky smell.  The mess when you try to fix it by scraping off the black part.  Now you’ve got a splattered mess of broken bread all over you, all over the counter.  Sheesh, now it’s all over the floor too.

It’s one of the biggest myths in home buying.  One of the scariest myths perpetually spread like jelly on that PB&J.  The one that makes me shake my head every time I hear:  My mother’s brother’s cousin said it was a good idea.  Yeah, well, it sounded like a good idea at the time.  But then the crumbs hit the fan.

Dual Agency Open Faced

Saving money by going to the listing agent.  Sure, it sounds like a good idea.  So what’s the mess about?

You’re about to sign a mass of paperwork but what does all that stuff really mean?

The Disclosure Regarding Agency Relationship.   Seller’s Agent – check – works for the seller.  Buyer’s Agent – check – works for the buyer.

Agent Representing Both Seller And Buyer.  Yes, it’s legal.  Whether it’s ethical or not is another story.  I say not.

You want to save money.  You’re going after the listing agent’s – now your agent – commission to do it.
1.  The agent signed the Agency agreement with the seller first.  Legally they represent the sellers’ interests over yours.  Read that again.
2.  Says right there:  …agent, may not…disclose to the other party that the Seller will accept a price less than the listing price.  Aren’t you looking to get the best price possible?  Guess what.  The listing agent can’t help you with that.  They can’t tell you what the seller will take – can’t even advise you what price to offer.  How do you know how much to offer without the expertise of the agent you’ve hired to represent you?  Oh wait.  They represent the seller first.

Can’t tell you why they’re selling – Huh?  Yep.  That’s right.  Seller getting a divorce?  Seller buying a bigger/smaller house?  Seller retiring?  All those little tidbits that may give you the upper hand – not this time.

Bottom Line

How can the listing agent get you the best deal when they’re trying to get the seller the highest price? I just negotiated $17,500 off the sale price of a home. You think that listing agent would have done that for the buyer? Her job was to get the seller the best price – but at what cost? The cost of your good deal.

Got a San Mateo County real estate question?   Call me at 650.888.9268 or send me an email Vicki [at] CallVicki.com.   If you like what you’ve read, subscribe to the San Mateo Real Estate Blog feed.

Start your San Mateo home search here.

Popularity: 52% [?]

Comments (0)

Vicki Moore, Realtor

DRE No 01234539

Graduate, Realtor Institute

RE/MAX Star Properties San Mateo County CA

san mateo real estate blog / facebook / twitter

T. 650.888.9268 / E. Vicki[at]CallVicki.com